Why Should I Choose an Employment Advocate over Online AI Advice?
- Anne-Marie Dolan
- Oct 9
- 5 min read
You might be tempted, especially in today’s age of slick legal‑chat tools or 'AI legal advisors,' to try handling your employment dispute yourself. After all, it could be cheaper, faster and is accessible 24/7. But there are risks associated with that route. An experienced employment advocate can make the difference between a frustrated loss and a just resolution.

You are not just a case. You are a person with a story.
AI tools may give you a legal template or a “best guess” path, but they can’t read the stress, frustration and fear that often accompanies an employment dispute and its potential consequences. A good employment advocate listens. They help you filter the noise, prioritise what matters, whether that be reinstatement, compensation, an apology or a change in process, and remain your anchor when the emotional stakes are high. When the pressure is on, having a human ally reduces the anxiety of “am I making the right move?”
They are not just a bot. They are a person with experience and knowledge.
Whatever your case, chances are they will have seen it before, in different iterations, and navigated it differently each time. Advocates have often been employers themselves and can use that perspective to your advantage. They may have sat on both sides in past employment disputes and that experience can be invaluable to your case. They can think creatively about potential outcomes, particularly in the early stages of dispute resolution, and suggest things that wouldn’t necessarily be generated by the algorithm. They bring their whole history of workplaces and employment law to the table and can apply it as they see fit. While an AI tool will generate information based on the facts you put in, an advocate has the ability to think outside that box and generate ideas to meet the needs of both you and your employer.
They can translate law from jargon to reality.
One of the biggest traps for automated legal solutions is the legal language and jargon. The path to resolution is paved with terms like ‘unjustified disadvantage,’ ‘good faith,’ and ‘constructive dismissal.” Understanding what the terminology means and how it applies to your case is essential to getting your approach and argument right. An employment advocate doesn’t just parrot statutes and precedence. They bring the law alive in the context of your facts. AI might generate a general template complaint. But it won’t know which facts to emphasise, or which risks to flag, or how the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) tends to treat a subtle point like a ‘delay in raising the issue.’ An advocate has seen many cases, knows patterns, and helps you tailor your presentation for maximum traction.
They can strategically navigate through the dispute resolution process.
Disputes rarely resolve in a straight line. They often move through stages, maybe starting with an internal grievance or disciplinary process, proceeding to mediation and eventually an ERA or Employment Court hearing. Each stage has its own procedural rules, choices, timing, and implications. An advocate helps you:
Choose the most suitable path for your case. Sometimes informal resolution will be a better choice than heading straight to formal proceedings,
Prepare a compelling grievance or notice, or response to an employer’s proposal, that doesn’t box you in,
Coach you in mediation and other processes, helping you to know when to push, when to settle or when to walk,
Prepare submissions, evidence, witness statements and cross‑examination strategies if the case ends up in the ERA,
Spot procedural or jurisdictional error by your employer, for example, failure to follow investigation steps, and
Evaluate settlement offers, not just for their monetary value, but for intangible terms such as confidentiality, references and future opportunities.
AI can’t guide you in those tactical turns. It can’t read the room, nor pivot strategy when new facts emerge mid‑hearing.
They can shift the power dynamic.
One of the consistent challenges for employees in an employment dispute is the power imbalance. An employer often has in‑house HR, legal advisers, corporate resources and time on their side. You might feel outgunned. An advocate helps neutralise that imbalance. They can add credibility to your case and ensure your rights are protected in procedural phases such as during investigations or disciplinary meetings. They can help prevent you from feeling pressured into low ball settlements or ultimatums and act as a buffer between you and your employer’s more aggressive tactics. They will hold the employer's processes to standards of fairness, both in substance and form. If you face an employer with legal counsel, your advocate ensures you are not out played or cornered simply for not having legal training.
They help reduce the risk of errors.
Do-it-yourself approaches, or over reliance on AI, can make it easy to slip up on things like deadlines, misnaming parties, failing to lodge a grievance correctly, failing to preserve evidence, making admissions you didn’t intend, or drafting demands that box you in. In some instances AI can provide misinformation, examples or rules that are not current or relevant, or potentially dangerous advice. An advocate offers a safety net by:
Checking deadlines and procedural compliance,
Ensuring your documentation is solid with timelines, witness statements, emails, performance records and other relevant material,
Helping you calibrate your demands so they are realistic, defensible, and persuasive,
Foreseeing possible defence tactics by the employer and help you prepare counterarguments, and
Helping you avoid “winning the battle but losing the war” with a technically successful claim but with terms or costs that leave you worse off.
In short, they help you avoid the traps that experienced respondents and their legal teams often set.
They deliver value, not just cost.
A common objection to engaging a legal representative is the cost. But when you consider that employment advocates often work on more flexible fee models such as “no win, no fee” and recoverable costs may be available from your employer if you win your case. An employee may also benefit from a well structured, well-negotiated settlement which surpasses the cost of representation. Not to mention the stress, time lost, mental burden, and risk of failure or under‑recovery if you go it alone. When you factor in peace of mind, more realistic outcomes, and a guided process, the cost often becomes a worthwhile investment, not an expense.
AI tools are evolving fast and can provide helpful first drafts. But they can suffer from structural limitations. Using AI as a first-pass tool is fine but it’s unwise to rely on it exclusively in a dispute where your job, reputation, finances or mental health may be on the line.
When your employment situation becomes a conflict, you deserve more than algorithmic advice. You deserve someone who will listen, translate the law into your lived reality, knows the paths and pitfalls, can be a counterweight to employer power and guide you to avoid legal missteps. In short, a human presence in a stressful process. Your workplace dispute might be complicated but you don’t have to take on your employer alone. Engage an advocate who knows New Zealand’s employment terrain, knows the stakes, and knows how to fight for you. Call Mathews Walker for a free consultation today. MathewsWalker.co.nz | 0800 612 355
Disclaimer: The information provided in this blog is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to keep the information accurate and up to date, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to the blog or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the blog for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. For specific legal advice tailored to your situation, please contact a qualified legal professional.
Comments